Tuesday, March 13, 2007

My Advocacy and Activism

Problem: Teaching is an apolitical act and unbiased, as such there is no need for advocacy about it... just do your job.

As outlined in the justification section, problems in society are reflected within the system that is school unless we actively work against that outcome. Palmer eloquently expressed how I feel about this fact, "if I care about teaching, I must care not only for my students and my subject but also for the conditions, inner and outer, that bear on the work teachers do." (p.182)
This section outlines three areas of advocacy and activism that I must engage for the success of my students:
1) Activism in my school:
  • Facilitate parent access to school and conferences
  • Encourage 'care' of students and their cultures throughout school
  • Analyze school structure for racism and bias (in tracking, in discipline, in achievement)
  • Work to change areas that racism and bias exist
  • Argue for bilingual education

2) Activism outside of my school:

  • Fight the deficit theory where ever it is found (deficit theory blames student's 'lower cultures' for their failure instead of working to change a system that fails them)
  • Argue for a more socially just society in all its forms (fight oppression)

3) Activism within myself:

  • Reflect on my attitudes and practices/soul search for bias and racism - change it when found
  • Know socio-historico-political realities of the students in my class, because it has an impact on their lives today
  • Become multicultural myself - learn about other cultures, confront my 'norms', see reality from muliple perspectives
  • Make choices against the 'path of least resistance'
  • Be hopeful

In light of the final goal of being hopeful, here are a few quotes:

"in my own work, I have seen the effectiveness of talking about racism and teaching others to do the same. I have seen the impact on educators I have worked with who are now transforming their curricula and interacting with students of color in ways that facilitate rather than hinder those children's academic success... I remain hopeful." -Tatum (p.xix)

"All of us want a better, more peaceful world for our children. If we want peace, we must work for justice." -Tatum (p. 127)

"hope can be sold, it can be taught or at least spread, it can survive in the strangest and most unlikely places. It is a force that does not disappear. I keep that idea as a counter to the reality-mongers, who try to sell the idea that compassion is a form of weakness and hope and justice are illusions." -Kohl (p.43)

"if you look for strengths and filter the world through a prism of hope, you will see and encourage the unexpected flowering of child life in the most unlikely places." -Kohl (p.44)

My Professional Disposition Toward Faculty and Staff in my Building

Problem: I teach my students, others should stay out of my business and I'll stay out of theirs.

Some teachers see there job as similar to a job on the factory line. They do their job, but don't think much about what other teachers are doing. With a social justice perspective on teaching, I cannot exist in the bubble of my own personal fiefdom. My students will benefit from any coordination of concepts and content with other teachers I can do. My students will benefit if I learn about them from others who work with them on a daily basis. My students will benefit if all teachers have the same high expectations for their success.

As hinted above, my role is twofold regarding interaction with colleagues. First, I need to encourage the 'warm demander' perspective among all of my peers, so students will get the consistent message that they can and will succeed with teacher support. I also need to work to collaborate with my colleagues to create interdisciplinary opportunities to learn concepts across different classes. Collaboration should also extend to working to figure out the best ways to support all students by working with TAs, Special Ed. instructors, and peers to co-plan and coordinate instruction.

My self-assessment Rubric: Do I work with my peers for my students' learning?

Problematic

  • I teach my kids, others should stay out of my business and I’ll stay out of theirs

Working on it

  • I collaborate and seek advice when I need it

Transformative

  • I seek advice and collaborate with peers often
  • I work to develop interdisciplinary units with peers
  • I encourage a ‘warm demander’ perspective in my peers
  • I am an available resource to my peers

My Homework Policy.Practice

Problem: Homework is sent home with the expectation that there is someone at home who can help the students decipher it, resulting in further inequities for students whose parents are less able to help.

Kohn argued that policies encouraging increases in homework have been shown to not raise test scores for students and increased the likelihood of disadvantaged students furthering their disadvantage because of an assumed home helper, time. He did not, however, argue how homework should be used. Beegle added to the argument about homework's potential for negative impacts. She said it should not be used as assessment because students in poverty do not have as much opportunity to do homework in a supported environment.

Homework, however, can be assigned and used in more positive ways. Delpit indicated that it should always be assigned with a clear purpose in mind. Alaskan Native families she interviewed were not encouraging their kids to do the homework they were assigned because there was no clear reason for it. Homework is an opportunity to extend newly gained knowledge, whether by acting on it in some way, or reinforcing it in some way. This ensures that students are prepared to be able to do the work without assuming some parental support. It also gets at what Freire calls praxis (the combination of theory, reflection, and action), as students are either reflecting on the learning or acting on it. Homework may also be in preparation for a learning experience to come, such as a short reading, an initial response to a question, or an interview of someone outside of school. The homework should never be the only opportunity to learn something, it should never take a lot of time to complete (unless a long-term project), and should never be graded if not given time to revise and work on it in class.

Sources:
Beegle, combarriers.com
Delpit, Other People's Children
Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Kohn, Rethinking Schools (fall, '06)

My self-assessment Rubric: Is My Homework Policy Equitable and Purposeful?
Problematic
  • I expect all students to have support at home for successful completion of homework
  • I grade every homework assignment I give

Working on it

  • Homework given only as an extension of what we’ve learned or as preparation for future learning
  • I do not grade homework

Transformative

  • Homework given as extension or preparation only
  • Homework not graded
  • Homework always given with a clear purpose

How to Help Parents Help Their Children and Encourage Parent/community Involvement in My Classroom

Problem: parents get in the way/teachers know their job, parents interfere (classroom as a personal fiefdom).

Many teachers believe that students who struggle do so because of a deficit in the parenting methods used in some communities. Parental involvement is a very important predictor of student success in school, but many parents feel disconnected or unable to support. Many times it is not bad parents, but no attempt to make parental involvement easier. Teachers need to actively reach out to parents to make supporting children an attainable thing. Parents who speak languages other than English need communication in their first language, parents who work non-traditional hours need to have opportunities to conference at convenient times, and teachers need to learn from parents about their students.

No matter what the family situation is, Nieto argues parents can support their student's learning by having high expectations and encouraging school success. Even when the content is beyond parents' capacity to help in the understanding and the language is a different language, parents can still do these two most important things. As a teacher, I need to communicate this to my students' parents and I need to show that I value that kind of parent support just as much as volunteering in the classroom, helping with homework, or coming to conferences. For parents who do speak a language other than English in the home, I should also encourage the use of the first language with the student, as it is important that first language development continue as a basis for second language development.
As a teacher who believes in connecting school learning with home realities and ways of learning, I also have another important role for parents: that they teach me. They know a lot more about their communities and their children than I ever will, so I can ask them to help me connect the content with their home realities. Rather than being an interference in my job, parents then become a resource for me to do my job better. I can use calls home, conferences, emails, and parent visits as opportunities to receive feedback on my teaching to make it more congruent with the needs and realities of their children!

In short, I have two goals with parents: 1- to value and encourage their support of success in their children and 2- to learn how to do my job better from the people who know my students best.

Sources:
Nieto, Affirming Diversity

My self-assessment Rubric: Do I value and encourage my student's parents?
Problematic
  • Parents get in the way, I avoid them like the plague

Working on it

  • I keep the parents in the loop about their kids behavior problems
  • I enjoy meeting parents and seeing where my kids come from

Transformative

  • I communicate with parents in their preferred language whenever possible and encourage them to encourage their children to succeed in school
  • I look for opportunities (phone calls, email, classroom visits) to get feedback from parents about how to connect classroom learning with student realities

My classroom management and discipline

Problem: Strategies based on white, middle class norms of respect and manners result in racialized inequities in discipline.

Lewis pointed out that racialized discipline patterns result from unspoken culture clashes. She highlighted the tendency for African American boys to be disciplined more often in schools as an example. Boys generally are more active than girls and in the African American community boys are encourage to put on personal displays, often function in groups, and verbalize concerns. In the classroom, these may be misinterpreted as disruption or cheating. In my classroom, I plan to take two actions that can help stem racialized discipline: using students' ways of being in their learning and clearly revealing the norms under which my class operates from the start.

First, I want to structure the class such that it harnesses the 'ways of being' of different groups as positives, rather than stigmatizing them as problems. This will include use of engaging strategies and curriculum, structured planning of class activities that doesn't allow for boredom (when behavior tends to be an issue), and offering options for ways of existing in the classroom (Stand if need to, sit, sketch while listening, music in background while working, etc.). Hopefully thorough planning and structuring of this sort will eliminate the need for much discipline. Delpit summarized four important aspects of teachers who represented true 'authority' in the eyes of their Black students: 1- interpersonal relationships that garner respect 2- belief that all students can learn 3- pushes all students to achieve a high standard 4- holds attention through use of Black communication patterns. Two and three were covered in the entry about the teacher-student relationship. Numbers one and four would come as a teacher learns the Funds of Knowledge in the community s/he works in, as outlined in the planning entry.

When discipline does occur, however, it should be based on clearly established norms and explained to all students at the beginning of the term. Students who don't know they are breaking a rule become the most frustrated with teachers' discipline problems. The process of creating norms for the classroom will be a cooperative process at the start of the year with the students. Hopefully, a few norms will suffice, such as: respect for teacher and other students, arrive on time and ready to learn/teach, and communicate issues right away so they can be resolved. These will obviously be flushed out with examples: raising hands as way to respect during discussion, talking during instruction as a non-example of readiness to learn/respect. This cooperative creation of group norms is practice for what Dewey called the more expansive view of 'democracy'.

Osborne outlined key principles of culturally relevant management and discipline that parallel those outlined above:

  • Explain cultural assumptions on which the class and school operates
  • Use non-competitive and meaningful group work (Students want to interact)
  • Avoid direct/overt management, talk to individuals privately
  • Avoid spotlighting excessively (for students who are uncomfortable with it)
  • Focus on Quality over Quantity of learning - students want to take time to really understand
  • Use the participation and language patterns of the communities in which you teach

In the end, management and discipline again come down to one's view of the goal of students being in the classroom. If I am trying to sort out the 'good' from the 'bad', with concern only for those students who fit my conception of 'good', then I will use punishment and rigid discipline based on assumed (non-verbalized) mainstream norms. If my goal is student growth and learning, then I will do what it takes to engage the most students possible in learning in the classroom. When I have to discipline a behavior, it will be based on a norm clearly known by the entire group and will have the goal of change, problem-solving, and return to the learning community, not punishment and separation from the learning community.

Sources:

Delpit, Other People's Children

Dewey, Democracy and Education

Lewis, Race in the Schoolyard: Negotiating the Color Line in Classrooms and Communities

Osborne, Practice into Theory into Practice: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for Students We Have Marginalized and Normalized

My self-assessment Rubric: Purpose and Outcomes of my Management and Discipline

Problematic

  • Rules are unspoken and assumed by the teacher
  • Discipline used as tool to sort and separate
  • Racialized patterns of discipline are evident

Working on it

  • Teacher creates and explains rules clearly to all students
  • Discipline intended as restorative

Transformative

  • Norms cooperatively created by teacher and students
  • Discipline results in restoration to community of learning and personal growth
  • Teacher looks for and works to change racialized patterns of discipline

Teaching Techniques and Strategies: The Ways I Choose to Teach

Problem: Pure lecture assumes that students are passive receivers of knowledge, blank slates with no prior knowledge. Using only one teaching method assumes all student learn effectively in one way.

My strategies have largely been outlined in previous entries. Some general teaching strategies included interdependent group projects, connecting content with real problems found in the community, having a concept focus of units, using various modes of learning (multiple intelligences) to ensure every student has access to info, using whole class dialogue/discussion, students learning from one another in various ways. All of these are strategies to differentiate my lesson planning to connect with different groups of students, and they make up my tool bag of teaching techniques. Underlying my use of all of these strategies are two main understandings that I must have in mind when choosing my teaching strategy:

  1. Knowledge is constructed by the students, so they must be actively involved with any learning activity I prescribe. If students are not learning, it is my job to figure out a way they can connect and learn.
  2. Every student has different needs, some of which need more specific strategies within a lesson plan designed to connect with different students. These specific strategies are called accommodations, and may be planned for students with disabilities, students who are learning English as a second language, or students who are gifted and get bored. Accommodations may also be spur of the moment decisions to change a plan for one student to facilitate his/her learning.

While specific accommodations abound for making the learning accessible for all students, I cannot address them here. What I can address is the mind frame that a teacher must have when deciding on instructional strategies. Teachers must believe every student can learn (high expectations) and that it is the teacher's job to ensure that happens. This goes back to the relationship of a teacher with students. It was summarized by the phrase 'caring.' Well, one instructional strategy with all students is a non-example of care. A teacher who cares about students and their learning will reflect on a strategy used and always seek to revise it to connect more fully with all students. Strategy selection, then, is fluid and based on how to engage the students most fully with learning.

My self-assessment Rubric: Does my Strategy engage students in Learning?

Problematic

  • I use one strategy that seems to work for a lot of my students

Working on it

  • I attend to student preferences and use various strategies that connect with various students

Transformative

  • I intentionally teach to the various modes of learning of my students
  • I accommodate for specific needs of students with disabilities, ELLs, and gifted students
  • I reflect on my strategies and revise based on student learning

Curriculum: The Things I Choose to Teach

Problem: White, male history of war and politics has turned countless students away from the true value of history as informing us of our present.

There are actually two issues regarding curriculum that I must address as a teacher for social justice: the actual content of history the class explores and the skills that are used and developed in the classroom.

The content we explore is, in part, outlined by state/district expectations. There are, however, different ways in which the content of the civil war could be examined. I might focus simply on the history of war issues between north and south, slavery as a political debate, and state vs. federal power. Or, the class could take a different focus that is built on the three principles below:

  1. As discussed in the planning entry, every lesson should build on student prior knowledge and experience.
  2. The purpose of studying history is to understand more about our present experience. It is pointless to study history as just a series of names, dates, and events that have no bearing on our present experience (a class with that focus would better be labeled 'Trivia', not history, as it is unconnected with any of our present stories).
  3. Concepts exist through time.

A unit on the civil war, then, should not be about covering dates, events, and names unless those dates, events, and names are informing students about concepts in their present existence. Concepts found in studying the civil war and ways they relate to present existence are below:

  • Slavery: it still exists in an underground world market
  • Racism: the basis for racial oppression (and race-based slavery) - how is it still present? What can we do about it?
  • Power: States' rights vs. federal (then and now), also connect with individual rights vs. under parent supervision as minors, or worker-boss and teacher-student relationships of power
  • Personal and Political action for change: abolitionists and amendments (activism then and now), how do you work for change? How can you speak out against common practices that are oppressive?

There are probably many more. The point is, when I enter into planning what content to teach, it needs to be with a purpose to connect with real-life issues of students now. Content then has a purpose, students gain a need-to-know about the content that will help them more deeply understand their own lives today. Content is no longer trivia, it becomes transformative and connected with, and revealing of the present.

The second aspect of my curriculum in the classroom relates to the skills embedded in the study of the content. Delpit pointed out the danger progressive teachers face when they only attend to the interests of students. Students can be left without the necessary skills and knowledge that would allow access to power in society around them. She called these skills and knowledge the 'codes of power.' Lewis outlined a similar concern regarding the concept of 'cultural capital.' Capital, as outlined by Bourdieu, takes into account the economic, social, cultural, and symbolic 'capitals' that people have from different communities. The cultural capital relates to the specific knowledge and educational credentials one needs to gain access to more resources in society. All cultures have cultural resources (Funds of Knowledge, FoK), but not all are equally valued within larger society as a means to access further opportunities. Lewis indicates that teachers should use and value all students' cultural resources (FoK) as a basis for learning, but also teach the knowledge that is valued by larger society as access to further resources. The ideas of cultural capital or codes of power become more concrete with an example: Colleges still use students' SAT scores as a piece of the puzzle in determining acceptance. Specific types of knowledge are embedded and normalized in the SAT (including particular test-taking skills). Teachers who want to give students access to further opportunity must teach the skills that will enable that.

Within the social studies classroom, there are many skills that will facilitate further opportunity and access to power for students. I will use two examples: public speaking and higher-order thinking skills. Social studies offers opportunity for students to practice public speaking through discussions, presenting projects, or working in a group. It also offers opportunity for students to develop higher-order thinking skills, including comparing and contrasting two viewpoints, summarizing a reading/video, or evaluating the value of a particular type of government. These skills are essential to have for essay writing on tests, for participation in a democracy, and even for everyday media literacy. I will use media literacy as an example for a moment. A student who does not know how to evaluate the value, based on reason, of an advertisement may succumb to every television ad that catches the eye. The student who cannot compare or contrast will never know whether to believe Coke's commercials or Pepsi's.

Osborne argued that content taught should address three things: relevance to student prior knowledge, it should foster a positive identity development for students, and it should empower them to function in society. I have addressed two of these explicitly. The third, fostering identity development, is embedded in the other two. Content should connect with the histories of all students (not just white students). Every exploration of every concept in social studies should include the social histories of all groups involved, not just those in power. Skills used in class should also build on students' present identities (FoK), while at the same time also developing the skills needed to function in society.

Sources:

Osborne, Practice into Theory into Practice: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for Students we Have Marginalized and Normalized

Delpit, Other People's Children: Cultural Conflicts in the Classroom

Lewis, Race in the Schoolyard: Negotiating the Color Line in Classrooms and Communities

Bourdieu, 'Capital' as cited in Lewis and Nieto

My self-assessment Rubric: Do I teach what is real and needed?

Problematic

  • I teach the textbook.

Working on it

  • I teach my students
  • I hope to connect the text with their interests
  • I teach the skills needed for success in society or I teach development of skills that my students have

Transformative

  • I teach my students
  • We explore concepts that relate history to our present experience, using the text as one resource of many
  • I teach skills needed for success in society and development of skills my students have

Field Experience Summary: Getting to know the Communities of my Students

As a teacher it is important to get to know the communities in which I teach. Brain research, psychological observations, and learning theory all indicate that ‘learning’ is the formation of new understandings on the framework of already existing knowledge. Any individual student builds her/his knowledge from experiences in and with the various environments with which they interact. To argue that the only important environment for learning is the school environment would be silly. Most students have learned to walk, talk, and have developed their own personalities before even entering school. If students learn a lot outside of school (even before entering school) it would be silly to ignore the ways in which the communities they come from share knowledge. A mathematical detour will serve to emphasize the point that the learning students are doing outside of school should be of interest to educators.
In this country students spend a lot of time and have many experiences in the school environment from the time they are about 5 years old until they finish school. By the time they reach high school, the level at which I will likely teach, they have spent a little under 10,000 hours in school (9 years x 180 days x about 6 hours/day = 9720 hours). Many will know how to learn in school by then, but others may not because it is so misaligned with ways of learning outside of school. Assuming an average of 9 hours of sleep per night, students reaching high school have spent much more time with their families and other places in their non-school communities learning many things. Before even beginning school, they spent 27,375 awake hours (5 years x 15 hours x 365 days per year). Once in school, they spend 185 days per year not in school, adding up to an additional 24,975 non-schooled hours awake (9 years x 185 days x 15 hours per day). Even on days when students have school, they have spent more awake hours in other parts of their community, a total of 14,580 (9 years x 180 days x 9 hours per day). The total ratio of awake (potential learning) hours spent for a student entering high school is 66,930 to 9,720, or about seven hours awake outside of school to one in school. If students are spending seven hours not in school for every hour they spend in school, it behooves teachers to learn about the ways in which they are learning in those other environments.
One could assume, ‘I grew up once, I know what they are going through and what their families are like,’ but this would be ignoring the simple fact that every community, every culture and subculture, and every family is different. Teachers who assume they know how to connect to all students tend to connect with only the students most like themselves. This is one example of how the majority white community of educators contributes to the preservation of the status quo regarding power and status in America. Many teach in ways that connect most easily with students in communities with norms and customs most like their own. They also discipline students who act in ways most at odds with their customs and norms.
This is where I come in. I am a white man studying to be an educator. I want to work with students of various backgrounds, though I have a particular interest in working with students from Hispanic backgrounds. It is possible I have experienced more diverse situations in my life than many potential teachers, having lived in urban, suburban, and rural communities that included everywhere from little to much diversity. Despite some exposure to some communities, I cannot assume my experience is generalizable to the lives of my potential students. I need to learn about the communities that my future school will service.
My immediate notion is to not limit myself to just a few groups that will be important to learn about. On the other hand, based on two important categories, I can probably narrow down the list of groups I most need to learn about. The two important categories are those groups with which I will most likely work and groups about which I know the least. I anticipate working in urban schools that serve large Hispanic populations, so I can put to use my background around Mexican and Ecuadorian cultures and the Spanish language.
Given that my life experience includes five years of living in Latin American countries, however, my need to know may be greater regarding the other cultural groups I will encounter in that urban setting. Depending on what part of the country I teach in, those groups could be distinctly different. I know very little about Asian cultures, little more about Arab cultures, virtually nothing about recent African immigrant cultures, and I could definitely use learning about Eastern European cultures. I guess that leaves many Euro American cultures, African American cultures, and Hispanic American cultures as the groups I feel I know about and interact with the most. Within each of those large groups, however, sub-cultures and family dynamics exist that I probably know little about and would be amiss to apply a general understanding of the group to.
Within the context of a given school at which I teach, I plan to analyze the groups of students represented and pursue an understanding of their cultural norms, ways of learning, and how each informs my teaching style and content. I have developed a list of starter questions and places to begin my learning through some reading and experience done last week (Jan 15-19, 2007).
Conversation Starter Questions:
  • What groups/sub-groups of people live in the area?
  • Why did/do people live in the area?
  • What are the traditional labor/work/business areas in the local area?

The following questions could relate to either the community served by my school as a whole or the different subgroups within the community.

  • What is a community strength?
  • What is important to the community?
  • What common knowledge is passed from the elders in the community to children in the community?
  • Besides those learned in school, what skills are important for young people in this community to learn?How to they learn them?
  • How do families establish social networks in the community? (i.e. for sharing resources/info)

Places/People to Observe/Interview:

  • The internet (demographic info on Census2000.gov*)
  • Home Depot/Lowe’s/local hardware stores
  • Apartment offices
  • Local places of Worship (Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, church, etc.)
  • VFW, American Legion
  • Local Bars/Taverns*
  • Post Office*, Fire Department, DOT/DMV*, Public Transportation*
  • Supermarkets*, corner stores, ethnic food stores/markets*
  • Restaurants* – ethnic and otherwise
  • Smaller clinics and the Hospital: ER*, psych councilors, financial councilors
  • Community centers, outreach centers, ESL schools for adults, etc.
  • Day care centers
  • County/city courthouse*
  • Local athletic events, fields/courts, community parks
  • Public Library*
  • Food banks, consignment centers*, etc.
  • Funeral homes, Wedding planners, party planners
  • Family/student homes*


Through observations and conversations in these settings about these questions, I hope to learn ways in which my interpretations of student behavior can become more accurate, ways I can prepare curriculum that connects with and builds on the realities of my students, and ways in which my methods can be honed to align with the ways in which students in the community learn. I visited a number of these locations to observe last week (as indicated by an asterisk*) and found the amount of useful information I gained varied based on the place, the amount of time I spent there, and whether or not I engaged people in conversations. The most useful information I gained came from conversations and data noted at the public library. The librarian with whom I spoke had thought a lot about the different communities that used the library.
In sharing and listening to thoughts with my group last Thursday, we developed a framework we can institute in any setting to learn the Funds of Knowledge (FoK) of a given community. We called it the 4 Ps to FoK and it included four aspects. First, there are People to converse with. Cultural insiders can act as guides and sources of information. Students, parents, local spiritual leaders, etc. should all be looked to as people from whom we educators can learn. Second, there are Places we can go to observe and interact with community members. These include school, the library, public transportation, walk-in service centers, restaurants, sports events, and any number of other community locations. Third, it is very important to have the right Perspectives when attempting to learn from and about a community. Most importantly, our goal is to learn, not tell. Be open to learning from kids, keep an open mind toward practices that might at first seem strange, seek to understand. Fourth, and finally, take on some new Practices. These may include reading the local section of the local paper, riding public transportation, volunteering locally, starting conversations with people, etc. By instituting the 4 Ps to FoK, I should continually grow in my understanding of my students’ cultural skills, knowledge, and abilities.
I suspect that a big part of learning about my student’s particular funds of knowledge will come from a new concept of home-visits. That is, a visit with the intent of learning from my students and their families what I should be doing better, not the goal to tell them what they should be doing differently. Based on my ongoing learning of who they are and where they come from, I can adjust my interpretations, preparation, and engagement with students. I hope to not loose track of the importance of learning about my students and how they are learning the other 7/8ths of the time they are awake.

My Lesson and Unit Planning

Problem: Planning content to cover without consideration of students' diverse needs and starting points is like giving the same driving directions to someone no matter their place of origin.

"[Teachers should] not think of a lesson as a lesson. Think of it as not a lesson just being taught to students, but a lesson being taught to one of your own family members..."
- Paul Chavez (student interviewed in Nieto)

Lesson planning should grow from a real desire to see growth/learning in every student. Traditionally, lesson planning has been about preparing content to be presented to students. This concept ignored the multiplicity of skills, needs, talents, experiences, and abilities of the students to whom that information was presented. A need for a new concept of lesson planning is revealed by science about how the brain connects with new learning. New neuronal networks form in the brain on the basis of old ones. New learning grows on the foundation of what we already know and have experienced. The natural conclusion of this fact for teachers is a need to connect every lesson within every unit with some aspect of every student's prior experience and knowledge... Wow, what a task!

Unit planning should start with a knowledge of the students who are in your classroom. Awareness of this knowledge can come through various means. One simple way is the use of a pre-assessment of some sort with students to find out what they know about a Unit before beginning to teach it. This pre-assessment may be a worksheet, activity, discussion, or something else, but it should inform the teacher about where to spend more and less time to support student learning of the content.


One issue I referred to in the justification blog entry was students' sense that school does not connect with their realities. This includes what is called Funds of Knowledge (FoK). FoK, as defined by Genzuk, include household social histories, methods of thinking and learning, and practical skills related to the community's everyday life (such as language and labor). The idea behind FoK is that education happens in one's community all the time and teachers should learn to connect that education with the education happening in school. For a more description and my plan for how to use the concept of FoK, see the post entitled 'Field Experience Summary.'

To become aware of and use students' cultural FoK, a teacher must become (in a sense) an ethnographer. Ethnographers go out and study a culture to understand its ways of being and report on it for various reasons. Teachers have a specific purpose for becoming ethnographers: to more readily connect new knowledge taught in schools with the knowledge and experiences students already have. Freire outlined a method for doing so:

  1. Learn about the place/people (read about, observe, talk with locals)
  2. Use their knowledge/reality as the basis for learning
  3. Use the problems that are real for the people as themes around which a concept map is developed
  4. Investigate the people's real problems with them (inserting necessary information when needed)

In a social studies classroom this may look a bit different:

  1. I participate in the community, observe, and chat with my students
  2. Vehicles are a large part of my sixteen year old student's realities, as well as their families (many of whom commute long distances to and from work)
  3. Gas prices are rising and families are stuck with tough economic choices. Students' limited expendable income is even more limited.
  4. I create a concept map around the problem of transportation and fuel prices. In my American history class there are state/district mandates to cover themes such as technology, transportation, and consumer spending. I create a Unit that connects each of these themes with the real problem of my students.
  5. We investigate the problem and inform ourselves of the history together, making changes as necessary to build the prior knowledge of each student to connect with the investigation.

This an example, in short, of how both pre-assessment and teacher-as-ethnographer can be used to create a Unit plan that truly grows from and connects with student realities.

I have to mention one other important element in lesson planning and unit planning for social justice. Just as not every cultural group does not learn the same way and connect with the same topics, individuals within any group will be very different. No cultural norms can be applied to all individual students from that group. It is incumbent on the teacher to get to know students as individuals, while at the same time recognizing cultural difference/norms.

One way to ensure individuals are accounted for is by differentiating lessons. That means, I intentionally plan different lessons to connect with different learning modes. Some students learn by writing, some by drawing, some by conversing, etc. I can intentionally work in choice of learning method, and I can intentionally push all students to try out methods of learning that are not their strengths (offering structure and support for growth along the way). This relates to Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. I'll speak more about this topic in my entry about my instructional strategies.

Planning to teach for social justice must take into account the different places my students start from, both culturally and individually. Pre-assessments, learning about Funds of Knowledge in the community, and ensuring lessons connect with different learning styles are three methods tools to use when planning a unit and its lessons.

Sources:

Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed

Genzuk, Tapping into Communities Funds of Knowledge

Gardner, as cited in Nieto

Nieto, Affirming Diversity

My self-assessment rubric: Am I planning for My students?

Problematic

  • I plan content to present without considering my students

Working on it

  • I have a sense of what life is like for students like mine and attempt to plan lessons that connect with them.

Transformative

  • I create units that stem from problems faced by the communities my students live in and connect with subject content
  • I pre-assess student prior knowledge of the content and start from where they are.